As you can see from the above link, religion plays a major role in why there still exists opposition to homosexual marriage. I'm seriously surprised Dailey didn't just flat-out say "IT'S SINFUL, THEREFORE BAD," although his slipshod arguments weren't too far off. Overall, rather than debating within a collegiate atmosphere of whether we think homosexual couples can make good couples, we should pool our collective minds together to determine how we can respectfully enforce the right for homosexuals to marry and raise children on a national level. That way, we're actually accomplishing something, rather than just debating a topic we largely (possibly, at least in this class, universally?) agree on.
1.) How would you address the arguments of someone who uses religion to discredit homosexual marriage?
2.) How would you address the arguments of someone who implies that homosexuals tend to be more "immoral" than heterosexuals?
I love, love, love your blogs! Thanks for posting the Bryan Safi clip. He is one of my favorite commentators when it comes to discussing LGBTQ issues and rights. I definitely get your point about debating on a topic we largely agree on. I definitely thought about that when trying to figure out which issues to assign, but I thought it would be valuable for all of us to get a taste of what the other side is saying so we can begin to resist and counter these arguments. I do like your idea about pooling our efforts and trying to engage in problem solving. Please bring that up tomorrow in class. I would love to brainstorm some "where do we go from here" ideas.
ReplyDelete